检索范围：
排序： 展示方式：
Nikita Shivhare,Prabhat Kumar Singh Dikshit,Shyam Bihari Dwivedi
《工程（英文）》 2018年 第4卷 第5期 页码 643-652 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.08.012
黄土高原典型流域淤地坝系泥沙拦截动态模拟 Article
孙彭成, 吴一平
《工程（英文）》 2023年 第27卷 第8期 页码 209-221 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.015
Corrigendum to ‘‘A Comparison of SWAT Model Calibration Techniques for Hydrological Modeling in the Ganga Corrigendum
Nikita Shivhare, Prabhat Kumar Singh Dikshit, Shyam Bihari
《工程（英文）》 2019年 第5卷 第1期 页码 181-181 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.009
基于机器学习算法的模型参数区域化方法在无测站流域径流模拟中的应用 Article
吴厚发, 张建云, 鲍振鑫, 王国庆, 王文圣, 杨艳青, 王婕
《工程（英文）》 2023年 第28卷 第9期 页码 93-104 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.014
模型参数估计是无测站流域径流模拟中需要解决的关键问题。参数区域化是应用最广泛的方法，但模型参数与流域特征间的非线性关系是参数区域化的主要障碍。本文以黄淮海流域内38个小流域为研究对象，进行了径流模拟研究，纳什效率系数（NSE）、决定系数（R2）和百分比偏差（PBIAS）的统计结果表明SWAT模型在各流域径流模拟中具有良好的性能采用6种回归模型分析SWAT模型参数与流域特征之间的定量关系，包括：线性回归方程(LR)、支持向量回归(SVR)、随机森林(RF)、K近邻(kNN)、决策树(DT)和径向基函数然后，利用其余37个供体流域构建拟合参数的回归模型，估算目标流域的模型参数，进行径流模拟。此外，本文也将基于相似性的区域化方法与基于回归分析的方法进行了对比。
Evaluation of SWAT sub-daily runoff estimation at small agricultural watershed in Korea
Ganga Ram Maharjan, Youn Shik Park, Nam Won Kim, Dong Seok Shin, Jae Wan Choi, Geun Woo Hyun, Ji-Hong Jeon, Yong Sik Ok, Kyoung Jae Lim
《环境科学与工程前沿（英文）》 2013年 第7卷 第1期 页码 109-119 doi: 10.1007/s11783-012-0418-7
关键词： Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) sub-daily simulation runoff rainfall
利用水碳耦合管理实现黄土高原植被恢复的可持续发展 Article
赵富波, 吴一平, 阴晓伟, Georgii Alexandrov, 邱临静
《工程（英文）》 2022年 第15卷 第8期 页码 143-153 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.12.017
多尺度作物种植结构优化及其伴生效应分析 Article
刘琦, 牛俊, 杜太生, 康绍忠
《工程（英文）》 2023年 第28卷 第9期 页码 139-152 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2023.03.012
Muhammad WASEEM, Frauke KACHHOLZ, Jens TRÄNCKNER
《农业科学与工程前沿（英文）》 2018年 第5卷 第4期 页码 420-431 doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2018243
Various process-based models are extensively being used to analyze and forecast catchment hydrology and water quality. However, it is always important to select the appropriate hydrological and water quality modeling tools to predict and analyze the watershed and also consider their strengths and weaknesses. Different factors such as data availability, hydrological, hydraulic, and water quality processes and their desired level of complexity are crucial for selecting a plausible modeling tool. This review is focused on suitable model selection with a focus on desired hydrological, hydraulic and water quality processes (nitrogen fate and transport in surface, subsurface and groundwater bodies) by keeping in view the typical lowland catchments with intensive agricultural land use, higher groundwater tables, and decreased retention times due to the provision of artificial drainage. In this study, four different physically based, partially and fully distributed integrated water modeling tools, SWAT (soil and water assessment tool), SWIM (soil and water integrated model), HSPF (hydrological simulation program– FORTRAN) and a combination of tools from DHI (MIKE SHE coupled with MIKE 11 and ECO Lab), have been reviewed particularly for the Tollense River catchment located in North-eastern Germany. DHI combined tools and SWAT were more suitable for simulating the desired hydrological processes, but in the case of river hydraulics and water quality, the DHI family of tools has an edge due to their integrated coupling between MIKE SHE, MIKE 11 and ECO Lab. In case of SWAT, it needs to be coupled with another tool to model the hydraulics in the Tollense River as SWAT does not include backwater effects and provision of control structures. However, both SWAT and DHI tools are more data demanding in comparison to SWIM and HSPF. For studying nitrogen fate and transport in unsaturated, saturated, and river zone, HSPF was a better model to simulate the desired nitrogen transformation and transport processes. However, for nitrogen dynamics and transformations in shallow streams, ECO Lab had an edge due its flexibility for inclusion of user-desired water quality parameters and processes. In the case of SWIM, most of the input data and governing equations are similar to SWAT but it does not include water bodies (ponds and lakes), wetlands and drainage systems. In this review, only the processes that were needed to simulate the Tollense River catchment were considered, however the resulted model selection criteria can be generalized to other lowland catchments in Australia, North-western Europe and North America with similar complexity.
关键词： diffuse pollution ECO Lab HSPF lowland catchment MIKE 11 MIKE SHE modeling tools SWAT SWIM Tollense River water quality
张明亮,沈永明
《中国工程科学》 2008年 第10卷 第10期 页码 78-83
采用Preissmann 4点隐式差分格式离散一维圣维南方程组，应用三级联解法求解河网水动力数学模型。基于河道-节点-河道算法的河网水质模型的求解特点，在WASP的水质模型理论基础上，建立了河网非稳态水动力综合生态水质数学模型，考虑了多个污染物变量的耦合计算、变量之间的相互转化和迁移。利用模型对4个河网算例进行验证。验证表明，水位和流量过程计算值与实测值吻合很好，各水质变量的计算值和实测值也符合较好，可见模型是合理可靠的，为河网的水质预测和管理提供了一个较为简便实用的工具。
关键词： Preissmann格式 河网 水动力模型 综合水质模型 WASP模型
会议日期： 2019年08月19日
会议地点： 英国
主办单位： De Montfort University, IEEE CIS, Dalian University
吴育华,张庆民
《中国工程科学》 2008年 第10卷 第5期 页码 75-78
从委托代理理论出发，对基于集成化供应链的委托-代理模型的一般形式进行讨论。在此基础上，结合工程项目集成化供应链中委托方和代理方的特点构建了工程项目供应链单期委托-代理模型和多阶段工程项目供应链声誉模型。
李成名
《中国工程科学》 2013年 第15卷 第5期 页码 37-41
本文首先提出了面条模型的概念，进而指出基于面条模型的图形处理系统如果不具备动态生成空间关系的能力，就会退化为简单的地理数据库，提出了面条模型中动态推断空间关系的基于Voronoi图的四邻近数学模型（4-adj模型），给出了唯一、完备的推断规则，并指出其优点和不足。
路峰,吴慧中
《中国工程科学》 2008年 第10卷 第10期 页码 84-90
融合显著性模型和高斯网模型的视网膜血管分割方法 Research Articles
Lan-yan XUE, Jia-wen LIN, Xin-rong CAO, Shao-hua ZHENG, Lun YU
《信息与电子工程前沿（英文）》 2019年 第20卷 第8期 页码 1075-1086 doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1700404
标题 作者 时间 类型 操作
Corrigendum to ‘‘A Comparison of SWAT Model Calibration Techniques for Hydrological Modeling in the Ganga
Nikita Shivhare, Prabhat Kumar Singh Dikshit, Shyam Bihari
期刊论文
Evaluation of SWAT sub-daily runoff estimation at small agricultural watershed in Korea
Ganga Ram Maharjan, Youn Shik Park, Nam Won Kim, Dong Seok Shin, Jae Wan Choi, Geun Woo Hyun, Ji-Hong Jeon, Yong Sik Ok, Kyoung Jae Lim
期刊论文
Suitability of common models to estimate hydrology and diffuse water pollution in North-eastern German lowland catchments with intensive agricultural land use
Muhammad WASEEM, Frauke KACHHOLZ, Jens TRÄNCKNER
期刊论文
数据和模型驱动的可信系统国际研讨会
2019年08月19日
会议信息
京公网安备 11010502051620号
